Our long-term vision includes the following battles, but not necessarily in this order and final selection is not concrete.Īdditional improvements and features are planned for later products.
IL2 WINGS OF LIBERTY SERIES
If our plan is successful, our engine and product line will evolve into one of the biggest and best combat sim series ever. Develop features, methods and opportunities to increase community involvement in the creation of interesting content and increasing social interactions between players to build a stronger community. Move to the Pacific Theater and build a first-class simulation of Carrier Warfare which dominated that theater.Ĥ. By making Kuban next, we will leave the Eastern Front a well-appointed theater that fans of the Eastern Front can enjoy it for a long time.ģ. Continue to use the Eastern Front as the proving ground for our engine, technology and game design for a little while longer. Build the technology and features the community wants to see in our products and try to re-capture some of the magic that made the original Sturmovik so much fun. Over the next few years we plan to meet four major goals with our engine, technology and products.ġ. BOS is a bit more easy going and faster to the action type of things, and this is good for some and bad for others To me COD is taking to much time and need more preparation. You have to give all simulators time in order to judge it. But man some of the Russian ones have a damn good feeling to it. I would say you need a interest for Eastern front, I like axis planes in Cod better than axis plane in BOS. This ugliness has been latent in flightsim community since the early days.
If someone recommend you not to buy it, they really got a ugly agenda by doing it. BOS is so much better in so many ways in some things, while COD is better in others. Personally I do not think COD or BOS can be judge by comparing them. Can you say you are satisfied with the choices when it comes to WW2 flight simulator. Will your family go hungry if you buy it?ģ. I personally find many answers here weird and very political.Īnd the question asked need to set some parameters to be answered.ġ. Is more hampered by some players behavior than by game issues, and their two tanks models add a nice variation in MP gameplay (if find any server with then), they are simple but have interior, are better than CLoD improvisation in this matter. But online is not too different from CLoD MP. if find someone interested in buy.īoS SP - like CloD SP and even IL-2 original SP, is very mehhh!. If you make a exclusive email for register in their site if don't like you can sell your account latter (provide is not STEAM version). (1) I think they should sell a cheap two planes version of the game (like in Russian market), this will allow more people try the game, and maybe buy more planes and OP - Get BoS on sales, sometimes is 50% off. Moscow is just "more of the same" with some different planes. * On topic: I find BoS price OK for today game market realities (1), and agree that still a not finished game due their initial mistakes - make a "combat flight game" + unlocks instead a traditional CFS, for try appeal for WT crowd, in what fail - but are improving a good pace. The reference to Warbirds Online - although not a "War Thunder" in numbers (but ~600 or more players on their server are common), was because are a "must" for the 'hardcore" CFS community at time due the novelty of the online MP appeal. visual DM, to not say again a proper WW II environment.Īt the mentioned Warbirds Online haydays I own EAW, WWII Fighters, MS CFS, Fighter Squadron SDOE and other CFS titles. No interest in Viggen's and F-18's.īut only DCWS "click'pits" don't justify their high cost, for the rest they are not different from other CFS and even inferior in some aspects, e.g. The other actual WWII CFS I own, including BoS* (don't play much) and the 4 DCS WII planes (all in the "virtual" shelf). If WT is the future of the genre, for me this genre can die now.
I already try WT for "15 minutes", thing is that gameplay is not my cup of tea, nor for the people that I used play together. Perhaps you should try a more popular game
0 kommentar(er)
